Article | . 2018 Vol. 36, Issue. 3
Yield and Inorganic Ion Contents in Drained Solution by Different Substrate for Hydroponically Grown Strawberry

Department of Agricultural Science, Korea National Open University1
Soil and Groundwater Research Division, National Institute of Environmental Research2
Department of Controlled Agriculture, Kangwon National University3

2018.. 337:349


This study aimed to determine the mineral composition of substrate and solutions employed for hydroponic cultivation of strawberry. Four different substrates, including peatmoss:perlite (v/v = 50:50; PP), rockwool (RW), coir dust:chip (v/v = 50:50; D50), and coir dust:chip (v/v = 100:0; D100), were analyzed using the and rural development administration (RDA) extraction before transplanting and after final harvest. Substrates were supplied with either University of Seoul (UOS) nutrient solution or distilled water, and mineral concentrations were determined in the solution drained from the substrate before transplanting as well as in the drainage during the entire growing period. Fruit yield, soluble sugar content and plant mineral content were measured. The european committee for standardization (CEN) method revealed elevated concentrations of potassium (115 to 119 mg·L-1; K) and sodium (26 to 50 mg·L-1; Na) in the D50 and D100 substrates, compared to other minerals, indicating that K and Na ions exist in water- soluble forms in the coir. The RDA method reported 20- to 200-fold higher concentrations of calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) in the D50 and D100 substrates when, compared to the CEN method, implying that larger amounts of Ca and Mg may exist in the coir that are not in a plant-available form. When the substrates were washed with the UOS nutrient solution prior to before transplanting, a lower Ca concentration (33 to 34 mg·L-1) was observed in the solution drained from the coir substrate compared to PP and RW substrates (78 to 111 mg·L-1). After final harvest of plant and fruits, the K and Na concentrations in D50 and D100 substrates were decreased compared to the never-used ones, while the Ca (130 to 159 mg·L-1) and Mg (62 to 79 mg·L-1) concentrations were increased suggesting the gradual leaching of K and Na through the drainage and the accumulation of Ca and Mg in coir during growing period. The result of a lower K accumulation in the leaf tissue of plants grown on the D50 and D100 substrates may be associated with the higher accumulation of Ca and Mg in the coir due to antagonistic interactions between K, Ca and Mg. Quality characteristics such as plant growth and sugar content did not change among the different substrates, however, marketable fruit weight varied in the order of D100 > D50 > RW > PP. Increased root growth resulted for plants grown on D50 and D100 substrates, while roots were smaller in plants grown on PP substrate, which resulted in drainage of lower pH than the optimal level.

1. Adak N,Gubbuk H (2015) Effect of planting systems and growing media on earliness, yield and quality of strawberry cultivation under soilless culture. Not Bot Horti Agrobot Cluj Napoca 43:204-209. doi :10.15835/nbha4319815  

2. Alt D (2001) Advantages and disadvantages of CAT-method for the chemical analysis of horticultural substrates as compared to several other extraction solutions. Acta Hortic 548:655-658. doi:10.17660/17660/ActaHortic.2001.548.81  

3. CEN (European committee for standardization) (1999) Soil improvers and growing media-sample preparation for chemical and physical tests, determination of dry matter content moisture content and laboratory compacted bulk density. CEN, Ref, No. EN 13040:2007:E.  

4. Choi SH, Ahn KB, Park SW, Chang JI (1998) Effect of ionic strength of nutrient solution on the growth and fruit yield in hydroponically grown strawberry plants. J Kor Soc Hortic Sci 39:166-169  

5. Colla G, SaccardoF, ReaE, Pierandrei F, Salerno A (2003) Effects of substrates on yield, quality and mineral composition of soilless-grown cucumbers. Acta Hortic 614:205-210  

6. Endo M, KiriiwaY, Nukaya A (2006) Effects of coir and peat ratios on growth, yield and water relations of strawberries ‘Akihime’ grown in soilless. J Jpn Soc Hortic Sci 75:344-349  

7. Evans MR, Stamps RH (1996) Growth of bedding plant in Sphagnum peat and coir dust based substrates. J Environ Hortic14:187-190  

8. Gabriёls R, Verdonck O,MekersO (1986) Substrate requirements for pot plants in recirculating water culture. Acta Hortic 178:93-100.  

9. Jun HJ, Hwang JG, Kim IG, Son MJ, Lee KM, Udagawa YJ (2006) Effect of double layered substrate on the growth, yield and fruit quality of strawberry in elevated hydroponic system. Korean J Hortic Sci Technol 24:157-161  

10. Jun HJ, Byun MS, Liu SS, Jang MS (2011) Effect of nutrient solution strength on pH of drainage solution and root activity of strawberry ‘Sulhyang’ in hydroponics. Korean J Hortic Sci Technol 29:23-28  

11. Jeong SK (2007) Characterization of symptom and determination of tissue critical concentration for diagnostic criteria in ‘Maehyang’ Strawberry. PhD Diss., Pai Chai Univ., Daejeon, Korea  

12. Kim OI, Cho JY, Jeong BR (2000) Medium composition including particles of used rockwool and wood affects growth of plug seedling of petunia 'Romeo'. Korean J Hortic Sci Technol 18:33-38  

13. Kim SE, Lee MH, Kim YS (2012) Appropriate pretreatment method of coir bag in coir culture. J Bio-Environ Cont 21:170-179  

14. Korea Agro-Fisheries & Food Trade Corp. (aT) (2017) Import & export statistics.  

15. Korea Rural Ecomonic Institute (KREl) (2016) Agricutural outlook. p 514  

16. Lee HH, Kim KH, Kang JY (2006) Comparison of the European Standard Methods and the Rural Development Administration Methods for determining chemical properties of horticultural substrates. Korean J Hortic Sci Technol 24:425-430  

17. Lee YH (2007) Improvement of physiological properities for sound coconut coir substrates for hydroponics. MS Diss., Seoul City University., Seoul, Korea  

18. Linardakis DK, Manios VI (1990). Hydroponic culture of strawberries in plastic greenhouse in vertical system. Acta Hortic 287:317-326.   

19. Marschner P (2012) Marschner's Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. Academic Press, London, UK  

20. Milks RR, Fonteno WC, Larson RA (1989) Hydrology of horticultural substrate:Ⅲ. Predicting air and water content of limited-volume plug cells. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 114:57-61.  

21. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) (2016) Status of vegetable production statistics.  

22. Nazari F, Farahmand H, Khosh-Khui M, Salehi H (2011) Effects of coir as a component of potting media on growth, flowering and physiological characteristics of hyacinth. Int J Agric Food Sci 1:34-38  

23. Nelson PV (1991) Root substrate, In Greenhouse operations and management. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA, pp 198-223  

24. Resh HM (2016) Coco coir grades and characteristics, In Hydroponic Food ProductionHM. Resh(ed.). CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, p 294  

25. RDA (2013) Plant mineral analysis, In Analysis Manual of Comprehensive Examination Lab, RDA press, Suwon, Korea, pp 67-73  

26. Shin BK, Son JE, Choi JM (2012) Physico-chemical properties of peatmoss and coir dust currently used as root medium components for crop production in Korean plant factories. J Bio-Environ Cont 21:362-371.doi:10.12791/KSBEC.2012.21.4.362  

27. Wilson GCS (1986) Tomato production in different growing media. Acta Hortic 178:115-119. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.1986.178.14