Article | . 2018 Vol. 36, Issue. 3
Analysis of Inter-Specific Incompatibility Using Fruitset, PCR-RFLP and Pollen Tube Growth in Pear



Pear Research Institute, National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, Rural Development Administration1
Department of Horticulture, Chonnam National University2




2018.. 388:395


PDF XML




Interspecific hybridization is a popular breeding method employed to introduce effective factors into crops. To evaluate the potential of this method to enrich the quality of pear fruits, we carried out crosses between P. pyrifolia and other species using the pollens of ‘OPR114’ and ‘OPR260’ of P. betulaefolia, ‘Dangshansuli’, ‘Xuehuali’, and ‘Yali’ of P. bretschneideri, ‘OPR125’, ‘OPR195’, and ‘OPR249’ of P. calleryana, ‘Bartlett’, ‘Bosc’, ‘Canal pear’, and ‘Max Red Bartlett’ of P. communis, and ‘Chuhwangbae’ of P. pyrifolia to pollinate flowers of P. pyrifolia ‘Niitaka’. Fruit set in ‘Niitaka’ pear after artificial pollination was investigated under both field and controlled conditions, which encompassed temperature control and use of water-cuttings of winter twigs. To assess compatibility of hybridizations, pollen tube elongation was analyzed in squashed styles under controlled temperature, and the self-incompatibility (SI) gene pattern was validated by PCR. Under field conditions, crosses of ‘Niitaka’ with ‘OPR114’ of P. betulaefolia and ‘Bosc’ and ‘Canal pear’ of P. communis resulted in incompatibility, as the fruit set was low. However, when ‘Niitaka’ was pollinated by ‘Xuehuali’, some of the pollen tubes reached the ovary but they then arrested and appeared swollen in the middle part of the style. PCR confirmed the incompatibility of these crosses, as the gene product from pollens was a different size from that of the ‘Niitaka’. However, interspecific hybridization under controlled conditions resulted in fruit production. We show that interspecific hybridization with P. pyrifolia and other species was feasible under controlled conditions. Suggesting that self-incompatibility of crosses was dependent on environmental factors rather than genetic predisposition.



1. Bell RL, Quamme HA, Layne REC, Skirvin RM (1996) Fruit breeding: Pears. John Wiley and Sons Inc., UK, pp 441-514  

2. Choi JK, Na DY, Kim DI, Shin IS, Kim MY, Lee HJ (2010) Genetic linkage mapping using interspecific hybrid population between Korean wild pear (Pyrus ussuriensis) and Japanese pear (P. pyrifolia). Hortic Environ Biotechnol 51:319-325  

3. Folta KM, Gardener SE (2009) Genetics and genomics of Rosaceae, Springer, New York, USA, pp 163-186. doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387- 77491-6  

4. Hancock JF, Lobos GA (2008) Temperature fruit crop breeding: Germplasm to genomics. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, pp 299-335. doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6907-9  

5. Hiratsuka S, Zhang SL, Nakagawa E, Kawai Y (2001) Selective inhibition of the growth of incompatible pollen tubes by S-protein in the Japanese pear. Sex Plant Reprod 13:209–215. doi.org/10.1007/s004970000058  

6. Hiratsuka S, Zhang SL (2002) Relationships between fruit set, pollen-tube growth, and S-RNase concentration in the self-incompatible Japanese pear. Sci Hortic 95:309-318. doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4238(02)00043-2  

7. Kang SS, Kim YK, Cho KS, Son DS, Jeong SB, Choi JJ (2008) Determination of S-genotype of Korean-bred Pear ‘Manhwang’. Korean J Hortic Sci Technol 26:422-426  

8. Kho YO, Baer J (1968) Observing pollen tubes by means of fluorescence. Euphytica 17:298-302  

9. Kwon MJ, Ramzan F, Ahn YJ, Hwang YJ, Kang YI, Kim CK, Younis A, Lim KB (2017) Chromosomal analysis of Lilium longiflorum x Asiatic hybrids using GISH (genomic in situ hybridization). Hortic Environ Biotechnol 58:591-600. doi.org/10.1007/s13580-017-0019-2  

10. Kotobuki K, Saito T, Machida Y, Kajiur I, Sato Y, Masuda R, Abe K, Kurihara A, Ogata T, et al (2004) New Japanese Pear Cultivar ‘Oushuu’. Bull Natl Inst Fruit Tree Sci 3:41-51  

11. Pittenger DR (2010) Evaluation of interspecific hybrid pears for use in Sourthern California landscapes. Dennis R. Pittenger and Reagents of the University of California, pp 1-15  

12. Sasavini S, Musacchi S, Ferrazzano GL, Ancarani V (2002) Hybridization of European and Nashi pears: Selecting for novel taste traits. Acta Hortic 596:255-259. doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.596.38  

13. Vavilov NI (1951) Phytogeographic basis of plant breeding; In the origin, variation, immunity and breeding of cultivated plants. Chron Bot 13:13-54  

14. White AG, Brewer LR (2002) Pear breeding in New Zealand. Acta Hortic 587:175-178. doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.587.19